973/FCS
Editorials
Members
Research Department
Image Licensing
About
If you’d like to commission a research report, strategic advice or get in touch to know more, please contact: marvin.heilbronn@footballcasestudy.com
Editorials
Members
Research Department
Image Licensing
About
National Pride and Protest: Mexico City’s World Cup and Its Contradictions
July 28 2026
The city was decorated with the phrase, “the ball returns home,” the official phrase alluding to a unified homecoming of the beautiful game. But the protests leading up to the World Cup instead expose the contradiction at the heart of that return. These overlapping scenes reveal the central tension of the tournament: the state’s desire for a unified national image versus the public’s insistence on bringing up what the state tries to ignore. This paper argues that national narratives are made not through consensus, but through the state's selective suppression of dissent and the public's reclamation of the symbols and spaces meant to unify them.
This paper uses the term "national narrative" to refer to the stories through which states and publics define what the nation represents. This analysis draws on field observations conducted in Mexico City in the week leading up to and the days directly after the opening match of the 2026 World Cup, including time spent at the CNTE encampment in the Zocalo, protest sites near Estadio Azteca, and public spaces of celebration. These observations are supplemented by informal conversations with protesters and fans, as well as contemporaneous media coverage and research on previous international sporting events hosted in Mexico, mainly the 1968 Olympics and the 1986 World Cup.
Historical Precedent
“Success,” however, only partially explains the story. Partido Revolucionario Institucional (Institutional Revolutionary Party - PRI), Mexico’s authoritarian party that led the country uninterrupted from 1929 to 2000, was interested in sport as a force for strengthening national identity. They used sport not only to consolidate power, but to unify a disenfranchised people behind the image of a successful society. The 1968 Olympics bid presented a “modern city that also embraced its glorious and ancient civilizational past,” highlighting the city as a coming together of different cultures (2). The Olympics came with a cultural push, with museums and public installations popping up throughout the country, showing Mexico's diversity to the world. For the current World Cup, a similar initiative happened, with the Ministry of Culture debuting a “Mundial Social (3)”of exhibitions at various museums and public installations "to leave a sporting legacy and share the country's rich culture with the world." But it’s been criticized as a "mirage to project an image of peace, progress, and modernity that masked the deep internal struggles of the Mexican state (4).”
Similar to sportswashing, the exhibitions and museums are used to curate a controlled national narrative, highlighting authenticity and artistic production that distract from society’s unresolved crises. The push to unite Mexico through cultural and sporting events had a flattening force and was only partially successful.
The 1968 Tlatelolco massacre best explains the shortcomings that came with Mexico's first hosting of the Olympics. Ten days before the Opening Ceremony, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) students protesting the authoritarian regime were trapped in Plaza de las Tres Culturas and shot down by snipers, with death tolls in the hundreds (5).”
PRI used sporting events and the branding surrounding them to unify, but only some differences are celebrated. Later in the tournament, President Gustavo Díaz Ordaz strategically embraced the Black Power salutes of American athletes, using their gesture of dissent to signal openness abroad while dismissing the massacre as an “internal matter (6).”
Both the silencing of domestic protests and embrace of the American athlete protests showed how dissent could be selectively welcomed when it served Mexico’s international image. This pattern of curated unity and suppressed domestic protest persisted in 2026.
The State’s Narrative: The Ball Returns Home
The issues most visibly protested thus far include the Madres Buscadoras and the teachers’ union, two groups whose grievances expose the gap between the state’s celebratory narrative and everyday Mexican realities. In particular, the Searching Mothers represent a group long neglected by official institutions. They are a volunteer collective of families who have spent years “scouring morgues and jails, hillsides and empty lots; knocking on government doors, marching in the streets, and talking to the media” because official institutions have not prioritized the search for the disappeared (8). Human rights groups often describe Mexico as a “country of disappeared,” with cases linked to both state actors and organized crime (9). The mothers’ frustration and protests are understandable: for years, the government has failed to provide meaningful support. It has even been accused of covering up crimes committed by police or military officials, yet it can now spend $1.3 billion to prepare the city for foreign visitors (10). After the opening match, federal officials went so far as to call for an investigation into how the mothers obtained funding to travel to Mexico City, accusing them of being criminals rather than citizens demanding accountability (11). The state’s defensive stance further illustrates how threats to the image of a unified nation are addressed.
In an interview done by Aristegui, a protester said, “For them, their slogan ‘the ball comes home’ is very important. And when will our children come home? (12)”, showing that the slogan’s promise of homecoming rings hollow for families whose loved ones have never returned.
Similarly, the unionized teachers directly targeted World Cup advertising on Paseo La Reforma, a historic street in Mexico City known for hosting protests. They spray‑painted phrases like “the ball won’t roll” and “long live the CNTE” on statues of famous players installed for visitors, using these disruptions to demand a 100% salary increase and the repeal of a retirement law, the latter of which President Sheinbaum promised during her campaign (13). The repurposing of official branding clearly shows how representation of the nation is contested over football, with protestors wanting accountability and recognition while the state wants cohesion, even if forced. A few kilometers away from Paseo La Reforma, in the encampments of Downtown, protestors also expressed a complicated pride for their country. Sports teachers from Oaxaca shared a love for the sport and their country, but knew that any positive social change came with a cost. “We will not be watching the game because we are here, but we hope Mexico wins,” said a couple in the encampments. This coexistence is similarly evident in the street vendors selling Mexico jerseys and panini sticker kits in the encampments.
On the day of the opening match at the Frida Kahlo roundabout down the street from the stadium, protesters brought signs saying “FIFA GO HOME” and the classic “Fuck FIFA.” Speaking over chants and live music, a protester told me that you’d have to work for eight months at minimum wage to afford a ticket to the match, really questioning how inclusive this tournament is. As planes flew overhead and green and red smoke filled the air for Mexico’s game vs. South Africa, protestors set up their own game. Spray‑painted soccer fields on the concrete became home to a more accessible game of soccer, one that anybody could afford and participate in. “Cascaritas”, informal, pickup matches played in the streets, have long been a form of belonging for working‑class Central and Latin Americans. One makeshift goalpost had a sign reading “pinche mundial, gentrificador,” which translates roughly to “Fuck the World Cup, you gentrifier,” while the other had a graffiti-covered picture of President Claudia Sheinbaum. “Street football is the real football. The World Cup is a ‘social scheme’,” said an organizer. This reclamation by the working class, the people the game has always belonged to, stands as a confident reproach to the polish of the official narrative: proof that the nation was never theirs to script, and will instead be defined from below.
Closer to the stadium, another group of protestors, mainly students from UNAM, threw Molotov cocktails at the police. Twelve students were arrested after being beaten and tear‑gassed. They were released the next day, but these events only strengthened the link between sport, protest, and state violence in Mexico. The clashes near the stadium show how quickly celebration turns into suppression when the national image is at stake.
“I'm proud the world can see that we have the capacity to host the World Cup," said a fan waiting to enter the stadium with her daughters. Moments later, though, she added, "The country is falling apart because of this World Cup." The juxtaposition captures the tension inherent in hosting a World Cup. There is an undeniable pride that accompanies playing, let alone hosting, a World Cup: it remains one of the few remaining stages on which a nation can represent and root for itself at such scale, which explains the enthusiasm many in Mexico feel at the game's return. Yet hosting a World Cup often invites domestic criticism, particularly when citizens perceive that funds allocated to the tournament might be better directed toward pressing problems closer to home.
Although most people weren’t outwardly opposed to the protests, many said they wished they would happen at a different time, because now was the moment to show Mexico off to the world. But this desire for a clean, celebratory national image is what makes the protests necessary. The contradictions in what exactly one should be proud of and how one feels towards the state are what make the nation.
Mexico went on to win the opening match, beating South Africa 2-0. People poured out of overflowing watch parties around the city into the streets, celebrating despite the rain and the circumstances surrounding the tournament. The opening match, like the previous opening games of events hosted in Mexico, was a success: a sold-out stadium, despite the high ticket prices, and a win for the home team was enough to send many people dancing into the night. But the protests remain as the tournament continues.
While the “ball returns home,” thousands of families are searching for their missing loved ones, teachers are living on the streets in search of better wages, and gentrification challenges who can even call Mexico City home.
What the World Cup Forgets
Historian William H. Beezley states that “national identity overlaps with popular memories [and] these collective memories serve as the building blocks of national identity.” World Cups, in this sense, are remembering machines, but they are selective ones. They aren't remembered for the protests outside the stadium, or the informal street soccer games played by people who could never afford a ticket. They are remembered for the goals, the trophies, and the images of celebration.
This is the tournament's real power: not simply that it unites, but that it decides what is worth uniting around. It highlights the contradictions of a host nation: pride and inequality, celebration and displacement, while at the same time smoothing those contradictions into a single, more marketable story. The tournament illuminates a country to the world, and in the same gesture, obscures the dissidents.
The images we've come to expect of fans from around the world celebrating and countries blurring are not false. They are real moments of unity, and soccer's ability to produce them is part of what makes the sport worth celebrating. But that unity is also curated, and it’s ingenuous to reflect only on those images. It is unity as it looks from inside the stadium. Outside it, in the neighborhoods being priced out, in the streets home to protests, a different story unfolds, one that the official memory of this World Cup is unlikely to make room for.
Endnotes
2. Castañeda, Luis. Spectacular México. n.d. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816690763.001.0001, 26.
3. Gobierno de México. n.d. “Mundial Social.” Gobierno de México. https://www.mundialsocial.gob.mx/.
4. Latin American & Caribbean Design Consortium. n.d. “1968 Mexico City Olympics: A Mirage of Peace, Progress, and Prosperity.” CUNY Commons. https://latinamericanandcaribbeandesign.commons.gc.cuny.edu/1968-mexico-city-olympics-a-mirage-of-peace-progress-and-prosperity/.
5. National Security Archive. n.d. “The 1968 Mexico City Olympics.” George Washington University. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB10/nsaebb10.htm.
6. Belam, Martin.“A Brief History of Olympic Dissent: Mexico 1968,” Currybetdotnet, August 8, 2008, https://www.currybet.net/cbet_blog/2008/08/a-brief-history-of-olympic-dis-5.php.
7. FIFA. “Host Country Agreement.” FIFA Digital Hub. https://digitalhub.fifa.com/m/3c077448dcd5c0ab/original/w3yjeu7dadt5erw26wmu-pdf.pdf, 1.
8. Human Rights Watch. 2018. “Mexico: Forced Disappearance an Ongoing Crime.” Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/11/26/mexico-forced-disappearance-ongoing-crime.
9. Ibid
10. BNamericas. “Mexico City Leads Investments for the 2026 World Cup with More Than US$1.3bn.” BNamericas. https://www.bnamericas.com/en/features/mexico-city-leads-investments-for-the-2026-world-cup-with-more-than-us13bn.
11. Nación321. 2026. “Segob investigará presunta financiación a personas de Jalisco para trasladarse a marchas de la CDMX.” Nación321. https://www.nacion321.com/gobierno/2026/06/11/segob-investigara-presunta-financiacion-a-personas-de-jalisco-para-trasladarse-a-marchas-de-la-cdmx/.
12. Aristegui Noticias. 2026. “La pelota vuelve a casa… ¿y nuestros hijos cuándo? Colectivos llevan exigencia por desaparecidos a la Estela de Luz.” Aristegui Noticias. https://aristeguinoticias.com/0906/mexico/la-pelota-vuelve-a-casa-y-nuestros-hijos-cuando-colectivos-llevan-exigencia-por-desaparecidos-a-la-estela-de-luz/.
13. Whitehead, Jacob. “Mexico World Cup Teacher Protests,” The Athletic, June 11, 2026, https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7349340/2026/06/11/mexico-world-cup-teacher-protests/.